Man who has oral sex cannot sue woman for theft because the sperm were hers to keep...
"She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift -- an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee. There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request."
And people wonder why I love the law...
"She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift -- an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee. There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request."
And people wonder why I love the law...
posted by -Me @ 2/24/2005 04:43:00 PM
3 Comments:
At 10:19 PM,
Ontario Emperor said…
Someday somebody's going to break into a sperm bank...or perhaps it's already happened...
At 12:41 AM,
Dennis! said…
Wow. I feel really bad for that man. I mean, who thinks they have to be that careful with their spooge, or else someone else take it and create a child with it?
I agree it's not "theft" per se, but I also agree with the court that he should be allowed to sue her for whatever distress arises from the fact that she basically harvested his sperm to create a life he didn't want a hand in creating.
And screw the chick's attorney, as quoted in the last paragraph. How's the kid supposed to feel when he/she is told that she was created not by a loving couple who wanted to bring her into the world, but by a conniving woman who stole spooge and used it against the father's will?
At 2:41 PM,
Scarlett said…
Ever watch "Legally Blonde"?
You should, in one scene, sperm deposits were discussed in the legal sense and she won her case.
It was a fucking riot. In fact, I love the whole damn movie.
Post a Comment
<< Home